LIFE IN THE DARK
EXPLORING CAVE RIVERS
• article & images by Dante Fenolio, Ph.D.
Excerpt from AMAZONAS Magazine
May/June 2017, Volume 6 #3
Groundwater wildlife: communicating science and conservation through photography
A crisp morning in the Ozarks found us sitting in the cab of an old, idling pickup truck, waiting for a couple of cavers to meet us. The heater’s fan rattled through the vent and pushed warm air out from the sun-cracked dash. Through the windshield I scanned the rugged landscape. Limestone cliffs rose hundreds of feet above the valley floor. Thick vegetation grew on the tops and sides of the peaks, but the trees had already dropped all their leaves and their bare branches swayed in the wind. One of the massive rock faces had an opening at its base with a stream flowing out of it. A thick cloud of mist rose from the cave mouth, steam swirling upward from the stream: at this time of day, the air temperature was a good 20 degrees cooler than the water. I wasn’t excited about getting into the waterway, even with a wetsuit, but this was an opportunity I had been waiting for for a long time.
The team arrived and we pulled on layers of cave gear: a polypro heat-capturing underlayer combined with a ballistic nylon oversuit to prevent damage or injury from sharp limestone edges. Over the years, I’ve found that this two-wetsuit system helps me remain warmer for a longer window of time while swimming in groundwater. With the remainder of our gear in hand—helmets with at least three lights, snorkeling gear, packs with water, some food, and other basic supplies—we began our hike into the mouth of the cave.
The stream inside wound through a corridor that it had carved from the block of limestone over thousands of years. The walls had been worn smooth by countless floods and strong currents. Most of the passage was several meters in width, and the water was 6.5 feet (2 m) deep or deeper in places. Just getting into the water is often the worst part of these surveys. Groundwater at roughly 55°F (13°C) trickles into your wetsuit. Before your body heat can warm the water, the temperature shock is…well, unpleasant.
One must snorkel to survey the cave system for a species of cave crayfish—our target. In the beam of a submersible flashlight, these paper-white crustaceans almost appear blue. They are delicate and without eyes. This species is a treasure found only in the subterranean waterways of the region. Regular counts of these invertebrates are included in our annual surveys for the United States Fish and Wildlife Service. We found a healthy number of crayfish that morning, and as I watched them scuttle across the floor of the cave I began to think about photographing this fauna in a different way than I had seen before. Watching cave crayfish move over the substrate on the bottom of the cave stream was amazing. I realized that few people had ever seen what I was witnessing, and I wanted to capture those images in situ somehow, in hopes that sharing such moments with others would help impart the value of these unique animals.
Years later I found myself in another cave stream on the opposite side of the planet—in South China. By this time I had photographed cave fauna in situ on several continents, and capturing subterranean species in the habitats that I have had the privilege of visiting had become something of an obsession. I had refined my underwater camera housing and strobes and now had a rig that wasn’t quite as heavy as the systems I had used prior; carting these rigs into and out of caves is a lot of work, and a lighter system really makes a difference. But the techniques were basically the same: lots of snorkeling and observation of cave fauna, lots and lots of images taken. I have found, however, that I prefer a combination of in-situ and photo tank images to photographically depict any given species. Years of refining my method have led me to a relatively simple system—I like to shoot a given species against a background of stark black, forcing the viewer to really scrutinize the centerpiece species.
In addition to my photography technique, something else has changed over the years. The group of organisms that I have spent so much time studying and photographing has become more and more imperiled. The majority of subterranean species have small, restricted ranges, and more than 95 percent of obligate subterranean species are listed by the Nature Conservancy as vulnerable or imperiled. A small range results in a greater susceptibility to extinction, and the potential for human disturbance of subterranean systems is high. One way contaminants can reach groundwater is through chemical spills—for example, a liquid fertilizer spill in Missouri contaminated an aquifer and killed hundreds of obligate groundwater organisms, including Grotto Salamander larvae, blind groundwater fishes, and blind crayfishes.2,3 Agriculture poses another major risk—through chemical or waste-laden runoff entering groundwater systems and through excessive use of groundwater for irrigation. When a groundwater system like an aquifer is contaminated by runoff or chemical pollution, the fauna living there have no place to take refuge—the entire habitat has been affected.
When I refer to the “importance” of groundwater inhabitants, there are several points that I wish to stress. First, although they rarely come into direct contact, humans and cave river fauna are actually inextricably linked, and contamination or over-harvest of groundwater threatens both subterranean species and humans living on the surface who rely on this water.1,2,3,4,6,7,8 Furthermore, the health of cave fauna populations reflects the quality of the groundwater in which they live. Groundwater communities include organisms such as amphibians and invertebrates, which are sensitive to environmental contaminants—particularly fertilizers, pesticides, and other chemicals.11,12,13,14,15,16,17 These animals are the proverbial “canaries in a coal mine,” and closely monitoring and watching for changes in their populations can provide early warning signs of impending ecological disaster.
Management of groundwater as a renewable resource is becoming more important than ever before. Well over of 50 percent of all US citizens, and millions more globally, now rely directly on groundwater for their freshwater needs.18 The risk of groundwater contamination in the United States is greatest in agricultural areas where, ironically, an estimated 95 percent of local residents depend on the resource.18 A similar pattern is observed in other regions of the world. And if this isn’t enough reason to care about wildlife living in groundwater, contemporary research indicates that we have much to learn from species that live in aquifers and what we learn can have profound impacts on our understanding of human issues. For example, studies of cavefishes are providing a better understanding of autism and schizophrenia. Undoubtedly, we can discover countless secrets through the continued study of these organisms.19
This brings me at last to the importance of introducing groundwater fauna to the public. If people don’t know about something, they won’t care about it—this is the truth underlying all the conservation and education efforts undertaken by zoos, aquariums, and documentary filmmakers. There is no better way to teach the general public about the unique but imperiled life found below ground than through photography.
The denizens of cave rivers represent an odd and fascinating community of organisms—lack of eyes and pigment in many species creates bizarre, alien-looking life forms. But is also important not to forget the deeply-rooted mystery and awe surrounding caves that has drawn humans to them for millennia. This is an important part of my approach as a photographer and conservation biologist—to incorporate “the cave” into my images of cave fauna and to include humans into those images. I think depicting the surrounding environment (and not just the animal) is critically important to instill an appreciation for the habitats themselves. After all, it is not merely the remarkable blind cave salamanders or crayfishes that are threatened, but also the waters and magnificent cave systems they call home.
I hope you enjoy the images I have shared here, and that they get you thinking about the animals that, although they live life in dark, isolated habitats, are nevertheless threatened with many of the same issues facing freshwater fishes and invertebrates worldwide. As aquarists, most of you already have a particular knowledge of the fragile diversity of the underwater world, but if any of the earth’s biodiversity is to be saved, those of us with a passion for these special species and unusual places need to step up and advocate for them while there is still time.
Online
San Antonio Zoo Conservation
https://sazoo.org/conservation/field_conservation
Print Edition of this AMAZONAS article: Order Direct from Publisher.
Related Reading
Keeping Blind Cave Fishes (or not), by Michael J. Tuccinardi
Excerpt from AMAZONAS Magazine
May/June 2017, Volume 6 #3
References
1 Culver, D.C., L.L. Master, M.C. Christman, and H.H. Hobbs III. 2000. Obligate cave fauna of the 48 contiguous United States. Conserv Biol 14 (2): 386─401.
2 Crunkilton, R. 1982. Bitter Harvest. Missouri Conservationist, Nov.: 4–7.
3 ———. 1984. Subterranean contamination of Meramac Spring by ammonia nitrate and urea fertilizer and its implication on rare cave biota. Proceedings of the 1984 National Cave Management Symposium, J Missouri Speleol Soc 25: 151–58.
4 Fenolio, D.B., M.L. Niemiller, M. Levy, and B. Martinez. 2013. Conservation status of the Georgia Blind Salamander (Eurycea wallacei) from the Floridan aquifer system of Florida and Georgia. Rep Amphib Conserv Nat Hist 20: 97–111.
5 Nolan B.T., B.C. Ruddy, K.J. Hitt, and D.R. Helsel. 1998. A national look at nitrate contamination of ground water. Water Conditioning and Purification 39 (12): 76–79.
6 Gunn, J., P. Hardwick, and P.J. Wood. 2000. The invertebrate community of the Peak-Speedwell cave system, Derbyshire, England. Pressures and considerations for conservation management. Aquat Conserv 10: 353–69.
7 Wood, P.J., J. Gunn, and J. Perkins. 2002. The impact of pollution on aquatic invertebrates within a subterranean ecosystem—out of sight out of mind. Archiv für Hydrobiologie 155 (2): 223–37.
8 Graening, G.O., D.B. Fenolio, and M.E. Slay. 2012. Cave Life of Oklahoma and Arkansas, pp 1–228. University of Oklahoma Press, Norman, OK.
9 Mace, R.E., R. Petrossian, R. Bradley, and W.F. Mullican III. 2008. A streetcar named desired future conditions: The new groundwater availability for Texas, Chapter 3.1. The State Bar of Texas 7th Annual Conference “The Changing Face of Water Rights in Texas,” San Antonio.
10 Margat, J. 1994. Groundwater operations and management. In: Gilbert, J., D. Danielopol, and J. Stanford (eds), Groundwater Ecology, pp. 508–22. Academic Press.
11 Cole, L.M., and J.E. Casida. 1983. Pyrethroid toxicology in the frog. Pest Biochem Physiol 20: 217–24.
12 Hecnar, J.S. 1995. Acute and chronic toxicity of ammonium nitrate fertilizer to amphibians from southern Ontario. Environ Toxicol Chem 14 (12): 2131–37.
13 Sparling, D.W., G.M. Fellers, and L.L. McConnell. 2001. Pesticides and amphibian population declines in California, USA. Environ Toxicol Chem 20 (7): 1591–95.
14 de Wijer, P., P.J. Watt, and R.S. Oldham. 2004. Amphibian decline and aquatic pollution: Effects of nitrogenous fertilizer on survival and development of larvae of the frog Rana temporaria. Appl Herpetol 1: 3–12.
15 Relyea, R.A. 2005a. The lethal impacts of Roundup and predatory stress on six species of North American tadpoles. Arch Environ Contamin Toxicol 48 (3): 351–57.
16 ———. 2005b. The impact of insecticides and herbicides on the biodiversity and productivity of aquatic communities. Ecol Appl 15 (2): 618–27.
17 ———. 2005c. The lethal impact of Roundup on aquatic and terrestrial amphibians. Ecol Appl 15 (4): 1118–24.
18 USGS (United States Geological Survey). 2005. Pesticides in Groundwater. http://ga.water.usgs.gov/edu/pesticidesgw.html.
19 Pennisi, E. 2016. Antisocial cave fish may hold clues to schizophrenia, autism. Science, DOI: 10.1126/science.aaf5813.
Online
San Antonio Zoo Conservation
https://sazoo.org/conservation/field_conservation
References
See online edition of this article for full references and to post comments.
https://sazoo.org/conservation/field_conservation